{"id":16985,"date":"2016-01-24T21:15:45","date_gmt":"2016-01-25T02:15:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=16985"},"modified":"2016-01-24T21:18:37","modified_gmt":"2016-01-25T02:18:37","slug":"unjargon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=16985","title":{"rendered":"Unjargon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A friend pointed out to me that my &#8220;Train of Thought&#8221; post the other day was incomprehensible to her.  And I realized that it might be incomprehensible to a lot of people.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is that I spend much of my time in a milieu where terms like &#8220;Turing test&#8221; and &#8220;Big Data&#8221; are understood by everyone in the room.  But that doesn&#8217;t help once you take the discussion out of that room, and those phrases just sound like jargon.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Turing test&#8221; is shorthand for Alan Turing&#8217;s famous thought experiment, which he called the &#8220;imitation game&#8221;.  The idea is that you test a computer in the following way: The computer holds a conversation with a person (over a teletype, so they can&#8217;t actually see each other), and the person then tries to guess whether they&#8217;ve been conversing with a real person or to a computer.<\/p>\n<p>This contest, the basic set-up for the recent film <i>Ex Machina<\/i>, as well as many other works of speculative fiction, raises all sorts of interesting questions.  For example, if a computer consistently passes this test, can it be said to think?  And if so, is it a kind of person?  Should it be granted civil rights under the law?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Big Data&#8221;, on the other hand, is the idea that if you feed enormous amounts of data to a computer program that is good only at classifying things into &#8220;more like this&#8221; or &#8220;less like that&#8221;, then the program can start to make good decisions when new data is fed to it, even though the program has absolutely no idea what&#8217;s going on.<\/p>\n<p>This is what Machine Learning is all about, and it&#8217;s the reason that Google Translate is so good.  GT doesn&#8217;t actually know anything about translating &#8212; it&#8217;s just very good at imitation.  Because Google has fed it an enormous amount of translation data, it can now translate pretty well.  <\/p>\n<p>But Google Translate doesn&#8217;t really know anything about language, or people, or relationships, or the world.  It&#8217;s just really good at making correlations between things if you give it enough examples.<\/p>\n<p>So my question was this:  If you use the Big Data approach to imitate human behavior, are there some human behaviors that can never be imitated this way, not matter how much data you feed them?<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s put it another way:  If you fed all the romance novels ever written into a Machine Learning algorithm, and had it crunch away for long enough, would it ever be able to sustain an intimate emotional relationship in a way that is satifying to its human partner?  Even though the computer actually has no idea what is going on?<\/p>\n<p>My guess is no.  On the other hand, there are probably more than a few human relationships that work on exactly this basis. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A friend pointed out to me that my &#8220;Train of Thought&#8221; post the other day was incomprehensible to her. And I realized that it might be incomprehensible to a lot of people. The problem is that I spend much of my time in a milieu where terms like &#8220;Turing test&#8221; and &#8220;Big Data&#8221; are understood &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=16985\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Unjargon&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16985"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16985"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16985\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16990,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16985\/revisions\/16990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}