{"id":27438,"date":"2025-04-28T17:01:43","date_gmt":"2025-04-28T22:01:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=27438"},"modified":"2025-04-28T17:01:43","modified_gmt":"2025-04-28T22:01:43","slug":"call-me-old-fashioned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=27438","title":{"rendered":"Call me old fashioned"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Recently I have come to appreciate the New York Times for a surprising reason. Yes, it&#8217;s the newspaper of record, and yes their reporters work very hard (sometimes against great odds) to uncover the real story.<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s something else &#8212; something that I used to take for granted. It&#8217;s the fact that the New York Times does not care that I am reading it.<\/p>\n<p>There was a time when that would have seemed like an odd statement indeed. When you pick up a newspaper, the newspaper doesn&#8217;t change just because you&#8217;re reading it.<\/p>\n<p>But newer forms of media, like my Google feed, are obviously watching me as I am reading. When they see that I have read about something, they immediately present me with similar things to read.<\/p>\n<p>Which to me seems backwards, because the last thing I would want to do after I have read about something is to read about the same thing again. To me that&#8217;s the definition of boring.<\/p>\n<p>I would much rather use my time exploring something new. Call me old fashioned.<\/p>\n<p>So I really appreciate that the New York Times is indifferent to my reading habits. Whatever I choose to read or not read, the contents of the paper stay the same.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s as though they actually believe in an objective idea of truth. Now isn&#8217;t that something?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recently I have come to appreciate the New York Times for a surprising reason. Yes, it&#8217;s the newspaper of record, and yes their reporters work very hard (sometimes against great odds) to uncover the real story. But there&#8217;s something else &#8212; something that I used to take for granted. It&#8217;s the fact that the New &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=27438\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Call me old fashioned&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27438"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27438"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27438\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27439,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27438\/revisions\/27439"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}