{"id":4015,"date":"2010-06-18T17:59:35","date_gmt":"2010-06-18T22:59:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=4015"},"modified":"2010-06-18T18:01:56","modified_gmt":"2010-06-18T23:01:56","slug":"word","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=4015","title":{"rendered":"Word"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My good friend Andy and I recently found ourselves on the subject of words that refer to themselves.  I first recall encountering such a word when I was about twelve years old.  Leafing through Webster&#8217;s Dictionary, I came upon the wonderful word &#8220;logomachy&#8221;.  It&#8217;s the sort of word you could imagine people fighting over, with one person saying &#8220;oh, there is no such word&#8221;, and someone else insisting that the word indeed exists.  Eventually of course they resort to looking it up, only to encounter this definition:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nPronunciation: \\l\u014d-\u02c8g\u00e4-m\u0259-k\u0113\\<br \/>\nFunction: noun<br \/>\nEtymology: Greek logomachia, from log- + machesthai to fight<br \/>\nDate: 1569<br \/>\n1 : a dispute over or about words\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>For the person who had gallantly defended this word&#8217;s existence, could victory possibly be more sweet?<\/p>\n<p>There are plenty of examples in literature of such metonymic word usage.  From Roald Dahl&#8217;s delightfully sly use of the word &#8220;epexegetically&#8221; in his wonderful short story &#8220;The Great Grammatizator&#8221;, which <a href=http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=421 target=1>I I talked about a while back<\/a>, to the decision by the music group REM to name one of their albums &#8220;Eponymous&#8221; &#8212; possibly the most clever album title in the history of pop music.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, as my friend Andy and I discussed, there are words that let you down.  &#8220;Palindrome&#8221; is, sadly, not a palindrome.  And no anagrams have yet been found for &#8220;anagram&#8221;.  &#8220;Onomatopoeia&#8221; is not onomatopoetic, except by the most tortured interpretation of that word.<\/p>\n<p>And so it is a delight when one comes upon words that are satisfyingly self-referential.  &#8220;Noun&#8221; and &#8220;adjective&#8221; work as examples of themselves, although &#8220;verb&#8221; does not.  The word &#8220;short&#8221; is self-descriptive, in a way that &#8220;miniscule&#8221; and &#8220;monosyllabic&#8221; are not.<\/p>\n<p>The word &#8220;grandiloquent&#8221; is, well, grandiloquent.  And I&#8217;ve always particularly adored the word &#8220;gargantuan&#8221;.   Just saying it out loud makes the whole world seem somehow roomier (go ahead, try it).  As opposed to the word &#8220;cramped&#8221;, a word that is all too self-descriptive.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Mellifluous&#8221; describes itself rather perfectly.  As do &#8220;abstruse&#8221;, &#8220;recondite&#8221; and &#8220;sesquipedalian&#8221;, although these last three are somewhat overly lexiphanic (you could look it up).<\/p>\n<p>Word to the max.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My good friend Andy and I recently found ourselves on the subject of words that refer to themselves. I first recall encountering such a word when I was about twelve years old. Leafing through Webster&#8217;s Dictionary, I came upon the wonderful word &#8220;logomachy&#8221;. It&#8217;s the sort of word you could imagine people fighting over, with &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=4015\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Word&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4015"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4015"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4015\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4019,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4015\/revisions\/4019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4015"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4015"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}