{"id":15272,"date":"2014-10-05T10:26:26","date_gmt":"2014-10-05T15:26:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=15272"},"modified":"2014-10-05T10:26:26","modified_gmt":"2014-10-05T15:26:26","slug":"new-versus-useful","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=15272","title":{"rendered":"New versus useful"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Spatial User Interaction workshop I am attending this weekend features many exciting new approaches to how people can interact with computers.  Yet I&#8217;ve noticed an odd thing about some of these approaches.<\/p>\n<p>They are cool, they are exciting, they are certainly thought provoking, but in some cases they just don&#8217;t work very well.  Recognition of a user&#8217;s gestures is often error prone, or subject to noise, or ambiguous, or just too coarse for allow fine distinctions.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think that there is some law of conservation at work here:  The more radical is an idea for how people can interact with information, maybe the less likely that it will be truly useful.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s <i>always<\/i> the case, just that I see a pattern.<\/p>\n<p>One example of this, which has become a bit of a joke among people in the user interfaces community, was the way the character played by Tom Cruise in the Stephen Spielberg film <i>Minority Report<\/i> held his arms up to direct things on the computer screen in front of him.  The underlying ideas, which largely came from John Underkoffler, were indeed exciting.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the way those ideas showed up in Spielberg&#8217;s direction, they didn&#8217;t really work on any practical level.  What mere mortal could really hold their arms straight out in front of them for entire minutes at a time?<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, it looked very cool. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Spatial User Interaction workshop I am attending this weekend features many exciting new approaches to how people can interact with computers. Yet I&#8217;ve noticed an odd thing about some of these approaches. They are cool, they are exciting, they are certainly thought provoking, but in some cases they just don&#8217;t work very well. Recognition &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=15272\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;New versus useful&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15272"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15272"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15273,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15272\/revisions\/15273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}