{"id":18270,"date":"2017-01-14T18:01:25","date_gmt":"2017-01-14T23:01:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=18270"},"modified":"2017-01-14T18:01:25","modified_gmt":"2017-01-14T23:01:25","slug":"one-minute-less","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=18270","title":{"rendered":"One minute less"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As I wrote about here last week, I gave a ten minute talk in which I needed to summarize my vision for the future, and what we are doing to help make that vision happen.  Ten minutes is not a long time, so the experience was a great exercise in learning how to focus.<\/p>\n<p>In a few days, I am going to give a similar talk.  Except on this occasion, the time alotted to each speaker is limited to nine minutes.<\/p>\n<p>I will probably repurpose my ten minute talk, cut out some of the remaining fat, and practice a few times to make sure I indeed hit the nine minute mark.  But that exercise raises an interesting question:<\/p>\n<p>What if, as a discipline, one were to talk a talk on some topic and keep iterating on it, each time shaving off one minute?  At what point would it be an essentially different talk?<\/p>\n<p>Obviously there would be a dramatic change when the running time goes from &#8220;one minute&#8221; down to &#8220;zero minutes&#8221;. \ud83d\ude42 But what about other transitions?<\/p>\n<p>The intriguing thing for me about such an exercise is that it would force you to boil your ideas and your narrative down to the essential, while providing a framework for doing so.  You could learn a lot from the choices you end up making about which ideas you keep, which you edit down, and which you simply throw away.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As I wrote about here last week, I gave a ten minute talk in which I needed to summarize my vision for the future, and what we are doing to help make that vision happen. Ten minutes is not a long time, so the experience was a great exercise in learning how to focus. In &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=18270\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;One minute less&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18270"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18270"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18270\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18271,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18270\/revisions\/18271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18270"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18270"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18270"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}