{"id":18873,"date":"2017-06-23T16:48:52","date_gmt":"2017-06-23T21:48:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=18873"},"modified":"2017-06-23T16:49:14","modified_gmt":"2017-06-23T21:49:14","slug":"the-history-of-language","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=18873","title":{"rendered":"The history of &#8220;language&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In yesterday&#8217;s post I referred to language &#8212; in particular, I referred to people referring to language as &#8220;language&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Latest research suggests that the species homo sapiens is at least 300,000 years old. <sup>(1)<\/sup> . It would be reasonable to presume that natural language is therefore much older than that.  But when did we evolve a word for &#8220;language&#8221; in any natural language?<\/p>\n<p>In order for a society to have the concept of a language, as opposed to having the language itself, it might be necessary to encounter another society that does not share their language.  It seems a sure bet that once any such two ancient tribes were to encounter each other, a word for language itself would quickly enter their respective vocabularies.<\/p>\n<p>But could such a word evolve in the absence of such an encounter?  I wonder whether there is any way to answer this question empirically.  Perhaps we would need to find a tribe of people who have remained culturally isolated, and learn their language quickly, before our own presence contaminated that language.  Of course a number of such tribes have been encountered in the last two centuries.  I wonder whether anyone checked their language for the word &#8220;language&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><i>(1)  Callaway, Ewan &#8220;Oldest Homo sapiens fossil claim rewrites our species&#8217; history&#8221;. Nature, June 7, 2017.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In yesterday&#8217;s post I referred to language &#8212; in particular, I referred to people referring to language as &#8220;language&#8221;. Latest research suggests that the species homo sapiens is at least 300,000 years old. (1) . It would be reasonable to presume that natural language is therefore much older than that. But when did we evolve &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=18873\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The history of &#8220;language&#8221;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18873"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18873"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18876,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18873\/revisions\/18876"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}