{"id":57,"date":"2008-01-23T23:58:04","date_gmt":"2008-01-24T04:58:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=57"},"modified":"2008-01-24T00:04:15","modified_gmt":"2008-01-24T05:04:15","slug":"most-sincerely","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=57","title":{"rendered":"Most Sincerely"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Wow!  The comments on yesterday&#8217;s blog were so thoughtful and interesting that I&#8217;ve decided to continue this thread for another day.  The question I&#8217;d like to focus on today is this: What would indeed be a scientifically valid test to distinguish sincere emotion from merely the artful simulation of it through acting?<\/p>\n<p>The first commenter points out that Ekman&#8217;s micromovements are not something of which the observer would be explicitly aware.  It is plausible, but not at all certain, that one difference between a merely good actor and a great actor is that the latter is actually incorporating these subliminal micromovements into the performance.  Detection of micromovements, together with correlative measurement of how convinced people were by a particular actor&#8217;s performance, could &#8211; and should &#8211; be incorporated into the testing protocol.<\/p>\n<p>A later commenter points out that we humans may have a native ability to suss out the fake when we are in the same room with someone, perhaps through smell, that we don&#8217;t have when we are looking at a video.  So today I&#8217;m going to talk about how one would go about testing for the ability to detect sincerity when there is a constraint that everyone is in the same room.  Then this ability could subsequently be testing against our sincerity-detection abilities when looking at a video, through the use of a 2&#215;2 study.<\/p>\n<p>By the way, this same commenter also points out that the strength of a democratic system rests largely on its ability to function despite the fact that people cannot truly trust politicians.  Point well taken!<\/p>\n<p>This commenter&#8217;s first point, about things needing to happen in person, suggests a double-blind study involving two kinds of participants: <i>(i)<\/i> a volunteer questioner; <i>(ii)<\/i> a respondent who is either a volunteer an actor.  The questioner is the test subject.<\/p>\n<p>The questioner asks a fixed series of questions, and is not informed as to whether the respondent is answering sincerely or merely acting.  First the questions are asked by one questioner of a sincere respondent.  Then an actor who has viewed a recording and transcription of the first session is charged with trying to duplicate the &#8220;performance&#8221; of the sincere respondent.  For this session a different questioner is given the same questions to ask.  After each session, the questioner is asked whether he\/she believes that the respondent was actually an actor.  <\/p>\n<p>This process is repeated over a number of different sessions, using different participants as questioners and different respondents.  The protocol would measure for a systematic ability on the part of a population of questioners to accurately assess the true nature of their respondent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wow! The comments on yesterday&#8217;s blog were so thoughtful and interesting that I&#8217;ve decided to continue this thread for another day. The question I&#8217;d like to focus on today is this: What would indeed be a scientifically valid test to distinguish sincere emotion from merely the artful simulation of it through acting? The first commenter &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/?p=57\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Most Sincerely&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=57"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=57"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=57"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.kenperlin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=57"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}