Ken’s Blog

In the last few days things have accelerated rapidly. There have been large protests in a number of major U.S. cities, and I suspect there will be more.

As I and others have said, the burden is on the protesters and their organizers to keep things peaceful. Public speech, including public gatherings for that purpose, is strongly protected by the First Amendment, as long as the protesters are not violent or disruptive. Like the U.S. Constitution says:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The ACLU also has some useful guidelines which I have found to be very practical and helpful.

Of course bad actors can create a false narrative. What shows up on Fox News can be very different from what actually happens during a peaceful protest.

I suspect that the forces working to create an autocracy won’t play by the rules. They will likely try to spin any acts of peaceful protest into some sort of violent rebellion.

So unfortunately, we may end up going to a dark place before we can come back to the light. After the people in red states start to feel the economic consequences of this administration’s policies — growing unemployment, sky high prices for groceries and other everyday needs, gas prices out of control, domestic agriculture becoming economically unsustainable, loss of access to affordable healthcare (the list goes on and on) — they will eventually realize that they have been betrayed, and will join the protests.

But by then, if martial law has indeed been declared, it might be a lot more difficult to restore democracy as we know it.

This much may be obvious, but it needs to be said: Everything our current president does is an invitation to a fight. That seems to be his entire playbook.

I don’t think he really cares one way or another about illegal immigration, or pretty much any other issue that does not directly affect his own power or his own pocketbook.

As it happens, rounding up immigrants like they are cattle makes for a perfect wedge issue to inflame his political opponents, and his approach to any situation is to inflame his opponents. Because when people are enraged, they are generally not thinking clearly or strategically.

So what Democrats need to do, immediately, is to condemn any and all violence, no matter how heated the issue. Right away that will take away a large amount of his power to win through the process of inflammation.

I think Mark Twain said it best:

“Don’t wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.”

Before going on with this topic, it might be useful to touch on the concept of planning of worst case scenarios. Even when such scenarios have a low probability of occurring, the consequences if they do occur can be very severe. So on balance, it’s good to be prepared.

For example, if you live in the Midwest in the U.S., you have probably experienced at least one tornado warning. When that happens, you are supposed to go to a safe place (most likely a concrete lined section of your basement).

Everybody knows that the probability of any given tornado actually approaching your house is quite low. But everybody goes down to the basement anyway, and waits the 20 or 30 minutes that it can take for the weather service to call the all clear.

It’s not that you really believe a tornado is likely to wander very close to your house today. But just in case, you don’t want to be anywhere near a window.

That is the spirit in which I’m discussing plans for responding to this administration’s pointedly political act of calling up of the National Guard in L.A. It’s not that we know for certain that the game plan is to escalate to an invocation of marshal law in order to scuttle the midterm elections. But just in case, we need to be prepared.

More tomorrow.

It was weird how quickly the facts on the ground reiterated my blog post from yesterday. The national guard has indeed been called to Los Angeles, on the pretense that there is some sort of “uprising”. Which confirms a number of the things I posited yesterday.

Let’s step back a bit. In working through a collective strategy for not letting our country slide into autocracy, it is important to understand who and what we are up against. So let’s state some principles:

1. We are not fighting one person. We are fighting an organized group that has been working on their plan for quite some time. And those people are a lot smarter than the clown in the White House.

2. These mass roundups are not, in fact, about illegal immigration. That is a straw man. The people behind those actions required a fear inducing wedge issue that would get blue state citizens riled up enough to put up a visible resistance — and they seem to have found the perfect one.

All of this is leading to an attempt to invoke marshal law, so that elections can be suspended in 2026. And that is what we need to fight against.

More tomorrow.

One of the dangers of our nation’s current slide into fascism is the illusion that everything is normal. Millions of people are still watching the same TV shows and movies, listening to their favorite songs, driving their cars to work, buying groceries, and ordering stuff on-line from Amazon.

There is still a pervasive illusion that the ability of our executive branch to function is not being systematically dismantled, and that large numbers of people in this country are not being summarily rounded up and yanked from their homes without due process.

But still, you can sort of see how this might play out. Obviously the people doing these things have no chance to stay in power once midterm elections come around. They are simply doing too much damage to too many communities — especially in Red states.

Which may be why untrained goons wearing fake military garb are being sent into liberal cities to round up anybody who looks hispanic. Maybe the entire point is to rile up the citizenry, to goad Americans into fighting back.

At that point civil unrest can be declared, and martial law imposed. Of course elections would need to be suspended.

If this is so, then the question is: What can we do about it, while we still can? After the slide into fascism is complete, our options will become severely limited.

Let’s look at just one of the many cruel and destructive acts of our current president. Apparently he does these things just to try to create the illusion that he is some kind of strongman.

In this case, he has ordered about $650,000,000 in NIH funds to be withheld from Harvard researchers, in the name of “fighting antisemitism”. I did the math, so you won’t have to.

On average, these grants support about $65,000 for each researcher (including the overhead needed to support necessary lab equipment and supplies). Which means about 10,000 researchers have been put out of commission by this one move.

Also, about 20% of U.S. researchers in this field are Jewish. So this directive is destroying the work and careers about 2000 highly functioning and hard working Jewish scientists. All in the name of “fighting antisemitism”.

Of course the effects of this cruel exercise in hypocrisy don’t end there. Pulling the plug on so much leading medical research will lead to a sizeable uptick in many preventable diseases, from Alzheimer’s to childhood cancer.

I can think of only one silver lining. Your mother suffering from preventable Alzheimer’s will be too far gone to realize that one of her grandchildren is dying from a preventable cancer.

Two people, who are arguably the two most powerful individuals in the world were until recently bffs. Now they are currently squabbling and hurling insults at each other like little boys throwing tantrums in a schoolyard.

Interestingly, just yesterday in a news conference, one of these little boys, who happens to be the president of our country, aptly described the behavior of himself and his former friend (this is a direct quote):

“Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy. They hate each other, and they’re fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don’t want to be pulled. Sometimes you’re better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.”

I had no idea the man had such a depth of self knowledge. Now isn’t that precious?

DOGE was supposed to reduce government inefficiency, aiming to save between 100 billion and $200 billion. That was the goal, anyway.

In fact, it ended up saving essentially nothing, and might end up costing us all money in the long run, while effectively dismantling the ability of many parts of our federal government to function. Collateral damage has included the unnecessary deaths of several hundred thousand children around the world (so far), after the United States government, which had pledged to help look after their health and well-being, suddenly pulled away that help without making any provisions for a backup plan.

But it turns out that there was indeed a reduction of between $100 billion and $200 billion. The reduction occurred in the personal wealth of Elon Musk, after his shenanigans caused TESLA stock to lose about 50% of its value.

So while our government has now been rendered incredibly screwed up and ineffectual, and we have managed to help contribute to suffering around the world, at least there has been some poetic justice.

So there’s that.

If I could go back in time and fix all my mistakes, I am not entirely sure that I would end up being any happier.

I was having a dinner conversation with some friends this evening, and the topic came around to magic mushrooms, and similar “spiritual drugs” that people use to expand their consciousness. We agreed that trying such things was a bad idea.

I understand the intention. If only we could lift the barriers that prevent our minds from seeing deeper truths, perhaps we might have greater insight into the Universe and into ourselves.

But as I told my friends, those doors that separate one part of our minds from another are there for a reason.

To put it another way, living in a house with no walls would not be an experience of liberation. It would be an experience of not having a home.