Reality distortion field

Everybody has their own reality distortion field, which they carry around with them wherever they go. Each of us looks at reality through our individual preferences.

There are things that I happen to like, and other things that I don’t like. You might find some things fascinating and things not so much. So in effect, no two people look at objective reality through exactly the same lens.

But what will happen when we all have those mixed reality glasses? There will be at least an opportunity for each of us to perceive the likes and dislikes of others.

If we can work our way through the privacy issues, we might end up getting a serious power up to personal communication. Once we can see each others’ reality distortion fields, we might find kinder and more appropriate ways to be good to one another.

On the other hand, it could all just be used to sell ads. This is definitely a situation where taking responsibility is a good idea. We should be paying close attention to Kranzberg’s first law of technology.

Relaxation and productivity

I know there is this whole thing in our culture that you’re supposed to be working all the time, under stress, pushing against the limits. There’s a kind of calvinist strain that says “no pain no gain.”

But I find that I am most productive and most creative when I find some nice relaxing place, with good light, pleasant music and very calm surroundings. I get myself a nice cup of coffee or cappuccino, lots of space to work, and just let stuff happen.

It is amazing how much more productive I am when I set things up properly to reward my mind and body, rather than punish my mind and body.

Bingeing all the versions

This pandemic can have a way of changing your TV viewing habits. I just watched Robin Hood, Men in Tights. I had somehow never seen it, although I am a long time Mel Brooks fan.

Now I want to see all of the Robin Hood movies. My plan is to go from the 1922 version with Douglas Fairbanks to the 1938 version with Erroll Flynn through to the 1973 animated version with Peter Ustinov all the way up to the recent 2018 one with Jamie Foxx and that guy who looks like Elton John.

After I’m done with that, I want to watch all the Spiderman movies. But I’m worried that it will feel like I am just watching the same movie over and over again.

Except for the animated one — that one’s good.

The rule of banana

When my brother and I were little, we used to make various concoctions in the blender. I don’t recall why our mom let us do this. Maybe we did it when our parents were away. I’ve probably conveniently forgotten those details.

In any case, we would raid the fridge and look for various ingredients — milk, ice cream, jelly, fruits, oreos — anything was fair game.

We tried many things, varying both ingredients and amounts from one experiment to another. It was always delicious.

After much emperical experimentation, we only discovered only one definitive principle. We called it “the rule of banana”.

It was a simple rule, and invariably true: If you put in a banana, then everything tastes like banana.

Future imperfect

Continuing from yesterday’s post, what is it, exactly, that caused the shift in our science fiction view of the future from optimism to pessimism and even paranoia? When, exactly, did we go from white mirror to black mirror?

From the perspective of the U.S., my best guess is the general response to our nation’s involvement in the Vietnam conflict, compounded by the Watergate scandal. That was a time when a large swatch of the citizenry rapidly grew distrustful of their federal government.

This seems to be supported by the timing of various science fiction offerings in popular culture. For example, when Star Trek came out in 1966, the nation was, for the most part, blissfully unaware of anything to do with the Vietnam conflict other than what their own government was telling them.

By 1968, the debut of two far more dystopian films — 2001, A Space Odyssey and Planet of the Apes — the cracks in our sunny narrative of the future were starting to burst open.

By 1973, in the wake of both Vietnam and the Watergate scandal, we had Soylent Green and Westworld, two films as paranoid as it gets. The tide had decisively turned, never again to turn back.

Future perfect

I was looking at some mid-century interior decorations today — the simple shapes, the bright colors, the sense of optimism — and it made me realize how much our society has shifted in 60 years.

There was a time when the future meant household robots! Rocket ships! Exploring the universe!! Now everything is dark and foreboding, and the future means dystopian disaster.

I wonder exactly when we lost our collective optimism. Maybe it’s time we got some measure of it back.

Mix and match movies

I wonder whether technology will ever get to the point where we can watch our favorite movie with our favorite actor even though nobody ever made that movie with that actor before we thought of it.

Below the surface, there would need to be plenty of machine learning and lots of other advanced technologies. There would also need to be other kinds of artificial intelligence, perhaps more advanced than anything available today, because human choices in acting are not readily amenable to algorithmic solutions.

But if we get through all that and we end up with being able to dial in our own cast for our favorite movies, I wonder how it will be received. Will people see it as a valid new medium, will it replace the conventional approach, or will it be rejected out of hand?

A proposal is like a house

We are in the final stages of writing a major proposal to the National Science Foundation. It involves lots of people and lots of money, and we have no idea whether it will get funded.

Even less than a week ago, much of the proposal was a mystery to me. But since then I have gotten familiar with every nook and cranny.

You know that feeling the first time you walk into a large house? There are many rooms, and you aren’t sure where everything is. This corridor leads to the kitchen, that door opens to the garage. Somewhere upstairs there may be two bathrooms.

But after you’ve been in that house for a while, it all starts to make sense. You know where everything is, and how to get from one place to another.

That’s what has happened to me with this proposal. But it’s like we’re building the house and getting to know it all at the same time.

As I get familiar with the garage, the basement, the living room, I’m also refurnishing them, making some rooms bigger and others smaller. I’m sort of hanging around in the house while I’m building it

In another few months we will know whether this proposal will be funded, and then we will really be able to move into our new house. I just hope the roof doesn’t leak.

Mindfulness

Today I talked to my mom. I wished her a Happy Valentine’s day and she wished me a happy Valentine’s day.

I asked her how she was spending the day. She told me that she spent much of it attending a mindfulness session, which is being held on-line on Zoom. I asked her how it went.

She told me that for most of it she just turned off her microphone and video and did other things around the house. I found that to be delightful.

And I’m sure there is a great joke in there somewhere.