Because the future has just started
What do Jonathan Swift, Mark Twain, Woody Allen and ChatGPT have in common? They were all born on November 30.
Three of those are known for their ability to show us the absurdity of our world. The fourth is part of a kind of absurdity that I suspect none of the first three ever imagined.
How odd that they were all born on the same day of the year. I wonder whether it’s all just an absurd coincidence.
I was attending a workshop the other day in which the question came up of what will happen to human creativity as AI continues to advance. One participant worried that AI might make end up doing everything, and then there would be nothing left for humans to do.
To my great relief, there was immediate pushback from many participants. One participant pointed out that children don’t need a reason to play together on a playground. Children play together on a playground because that’s what they like to do.
Similarly, we don’t do things just because they need to be done. We often do things because that’s what we like to do.
We take a walk, converse with one another, paint, play the guitar, and do a million other things simply because it feels good to o them. And in the case of engaging in these pleasurable activities, we often come up with new ideas.
This is wildly different from what AI does. AI does not engage in pleasurable activities, or think about things or people just because those things or people happen to be amusing or intriguing or charming.
Yes, AI will continue to advance. But that doesn’t mean that AI will replace us, any more than cars or telephones or pianos have replaced us.
Our tools and technologies, no matter how powerful they become, do not replace us. They simply allow us to express our humanity in new ways.
Two related techniques are currently rising at once: Extended reality and large language models.
As with any emerging technology, these are still finding each other. Each one is still finding its sea legs, and expanding its potential.
Yet as they each advance in their own respective spaces, they are gradually beginning to overlap in purpose. So here are two salient questions:
(1) What is the overlap between XR and LLM based AI? (2) When they fully meet each other, what will be their combined impact on the world?
One of the key ingredients for being on the cusp of an information revolution is the presence of two revolutionary technologies that happen to coincide.
One example of this occurred in 1953. At about the same time that the transistor radio was revolutionizing distribution of music, the Fender Bass was making it possible to put on live rock and roll concerts for large audiences.
Two fundamentally game-changing technological revolutions were happening at the same time in related fields. Each built upon the other.
So it is reasonable to ask:At this moment in time, what are two related technological innovations in communication that are occurring simultaneously?
More tomorrow.
How do we know when we are on the cusp of a new paradigm of communication, commensurate with the advent of written language or the invention of photography?
I will explore this question in more depth in the coming days.
Astonishingly, we have now entered an era in which it is illegal to simply remind people of the law. In fact, it seems to be an act of sedition.
Apparently, simply for stating the law, Senator Mark Kelly is being investigated for the crime of sedition. Our nation’s SODAFOP (Secretary of Defense and Former Television Personality) has called for the Pentagon to investigate the esteemed Senator from Arizona.
I know, I know, it sounds like something out of a sketch by Monty Python. But even the Pythons knew when something was too absurd.
In a way this is liberating. If you ever get pulled over by a police officer and he tries to read you your rights, you can respond arresting the cop — a citizen’s arrest — for committing exactly the same crime that Senator Kelly committed.
Poor George Orwell. The only slogans he could come up with for his fictional dystopia were “War is Peace”. “Freedom is Slavery” and “Ignorance is Strength”. It probably never occurred to him that the real world would end up embracing something as mind-numbingly stupid as “Legal is Illegal”.
I’m thinking I might want to devote Monday posts to math topics. Maybe these posts should be called Math Mondays. Today seems like a find day to start.
I remember in my early twenties wondering why things always blur in a Gaussian function e-x2. Then one day it occurred to me that there is no other possibility.
What I realized is that if you blur something horizontally, and also blur it vertically, then the blur needs to be circular. If you got any other result, it would not really be blurring.
And the Gaussian function is the one function that does exactly that, because when you multiply two functions ab and ac, you are really just adding their exponents ab+c.
Which is why Gaussians (and only Gaussians) make a circular blur shape when you blur in x (horizontally) and also blur in y (vertically):
e-x2 * e-y2 = e-(x2+y2)
If you look at the resulting exponent, you realize that the blur is circularly symmetric. It drops off as the square of distance. And the Gaussian function is the only “drop off with distance” function for which this is true.
As Pascal might have said, et voila!
Here are 50 nicknames, and 50 professions.
Can you match the name to the profession?
Art Bart Bill Brad Cal Cam Chick Chuck Cliff Court Drew Dot Doug Emmy Eve Flora Gene Gig Gil Hattie Jean Jimmy John Josh Kit Lolly Mark Matt Millie Mort Ollie Oscar Pat Penny Rich Rod Rose Rusty Sandy Shel Sherry Sue Stu Teddy Tony Trix Van Wade Will Woody |
Nightgown salesman Theater actor Modelmaker Painter Liquor salesman Undertaker Wrestler Skateboarder Judge Machinist Session musician Comedian Millionaire Pointillist Botanist First lady Grave digger Organic chemist Arborist Draftsman Poultry farmer Levi's salesman Balloonist Metallurgist Plumber Masseuse Garbageman Candy store owner Carpenter Locksmith Beachcomber Milliner Deliveryman Dietician Movie actor Legislator Lawyer TV actor Berkeley train conductor Mountain climber Estate planner Conchologist Ichthyologist Photographer Coin collector Lifeguard Fisherman Chef Magician Penman |
Today the NY Times reported that hundreds of students and faculty and staff members at the University of Pennsylvania signed a petition this week in support of their university’s refusal to turn over to the Trump administration names, phone numbers and physical addresses for some Jewish employees. The administration sued the university on Tuesday, arguing that the Ivy League institution has “refused to comply” with a subpoena from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which is investigating antisemitism on the Philadelphia campus.
The subpoena seeks contact information for employees who have filed complaints about discrimination based on Jewish faith, those who belong to Jewish clubs or groups on campus, and anyone who works in the university’s Jewish studies program, according to the lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The information is “relevant to the EEOC’s investigation of potential unlawful employment practices, namely religious, national origin, and race-based harassment,” the E.E.O.C. says in a court filing.
A day after the suit was filed, a petition began circulating in the university community aimed at offering “our strongest support for the University of Pennsylvania’s decision to refuse to collect and share lists of names and personal contact information of Jewish students, faculty, and staff with the federal government.”
Amanda Shanor, an associate professor at Wharton, the university’s business school, who helped organize the petition, said the administration’s request was “terrifying.” “The history of creating lists of Jewish people for the government is one of the most frightening in world history,” Ms. Shanor said in an interview on Friday. “And the idea that this is being done in the interest of the Jewish community is particularly frightening.”
The executive committee of Penn’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors has applauded the university for refusing to comply. Penn Hillel and MEOR Penn, two prominent Jewish groups on campus, issued a joint statement saying they supported the fight against antisemitism but were “deeply concerned” about the E.E.O.C.’s subpoena, adding that “the privacy, consent and safety of Jewish students, staff and faculty cannot be compromised. Collection of Jews’ private information carries echoes of the very patterns that made Jewish communities vulnerable for centuries,” the statement said.
Liz Huston, a spokeswoman for the White House, said the Trump administration would “always aggressively enforce the law, protect public safety and prosecute incidents of illegal discrimination. The University of Pennsylvania should comply with the straightforward subpoena and demonstrate their commitment to safeguarding their students.”
“But it’s ok,” she added, “We have an alternate plan in place. To better protect Jewish students and faculty at U. Penn, we are printing up yellow stars for them to pin to their chests. That way, as they go to their classes, everyone will know who they are, so nobody will be able to discriminate against them.”
I am about to engage in a year long project. I will be updating all of those many on-line Java applets on my NTU homepage.
I started creating those applets in 1996, the first year you could create an interactive Java applet and post it on-line. Over time I created various support libraries for them, including a pretty comprehensive 3D software renderer.
But then in January 14, 2014 it all came crashing down — that’s when Oracle officially declared that unsigned Java applets were not ok. From then on my little experiments no longer worked on the Web.
So for the next 12 months I am going to be rewriting as many of them as I can. On the surface they will hopefully look the same, but underneath they will all be Javascript.
Some will run with Canvas2D and others will run with WebGL — I will need to decide on a case by case basis. But the underlying ideas will remain the same.
And that’s the great thing about ideas. Unlike technology, ideas can last forever.