This evening a friend mentioned to me the Feynman Algorithm for solving problems. It’s a simple three step technique:
- Write down a problem.
- Think real hard.
- Write down the solution.
I had never heard of this wonderful algorithm, so when I got home I looked it up. It was actually suggested by the great physicist Murray Gell-Mann, presumably as a way to convey how much more brilliant Richard Feynman was than anybody else.
But when my friend told me about this algorithm, I had a very particular response. I told her that I often find myself solving the reverse problem, using what might be called the Inverse Feynman Algorithm:
- Write down a solution.
- Think real hard.
- Write down the problem.
This describes, more or less, how a lot of research actually works. We’re always thinking of some cool new technique or other. But every once in a while, if we think very hard and we’re very lucky, we sometimes also figure out what it might be good for.
That’s the difference between science and business. In business it is:
1. Write down a target.
2. Look at what’s already there.
3. Write down the problems.
4. Think really hard.
5. Find a solution to bridge the gap.
At times I would love to have the freedom to go for the Inverse Feynman. 😉 That is why I envy you.
Very cool concept. I wish it worked for writing movies and tv.
But Media works more like this.
Think of a character, their dilemma and a resonant theme.
Add an antagonist and a bunch of increasing obstacles.
Come up with a clever twist and climax. (ala Reavers)
go back and start again.