What would Socrates think?

There is an argument that our tools make us smarter. There is another argument that our tools make us more stupid.

According to Plato, Socrates believed that written language was harmful, since it could lead to relying on external memory aids, and therefore impede true understanding. If anything, humanity has gone deep into the waters that Socrates warned against.

Where things get complex is the way that we are intertwined with our tools. If you grow up with a particular technology, it can be argued that the technology becomes part of you.

If, throughout my life, I know that I can write things down, then the act of writing things down becomes a kind of extension of myself. The written words that I leave behind are arguably a part of me, and they help to define my identity.

One day in the future, when each of us is integrated with his or her personalized A.I., will we be smarter for it, or more stupid? We will certainly seem to be outwardly more capable, the real-life equivalent of Trinity knowing how to fly the helicopter in The Matrix.

But will that capability truly be part of who we are, or will we just be kidding ourselves? I wonder what Socrates would think.

Crazy like a fox

I was thinking today about the creep’s latest conspiracy theory — his claim that his predecessor’s presidential pardons don’t count because some of them may have been signed with an autopen. It’s a completely idiotic assertion, particularly given the number of times that he himself signed via autopen during his first term.

Of course the assertion itself doesn’t actually make any sense. But I don’t think that making sense was the point of this latest bit of craziness.

I think the point of all of his wild falsehoods and actions — claiming that Ukraine started the war that Russia started by invading Ukraine, randomly deporting university professors for no reason, I could go on and on here — is to relentlessly pile one obvious falsehood on top of another, so as to continually stoke rage, to the point where the very concept of rational discussion breaks down.

If there can no longer be rational discussion, then truth doesn’t matter. And that’s how autocrats destroy democracies on their way to absolute power.

So sure, the creep is once again being crazy. But he is being crazy like a fox.

Annexation

My post yesterday was somewhat tongue in cheek. There are all sorts of practical reasons why neither the U.S. nor Canada should annex the other.

But if annexation were to happen, we would need a fair way to decide which country should annex the other. Here is a simple suggestion.

Add up all of the square miles of each of the two countries in question, and see which one is bigger. After all, it would be absurd for a smaller country to annex a larger country.

So whichever country is larger should be the one to annex the country that is smaller. Simple, right?

On the other hand, we all need to acknowledge a simple fact: Anybody who would seriously suggest that either of these two countries should be absorbed into the other is a blithering idiot.

Late breaking news

In late breaking news, Canada has just annexed the country immediately south of its border. The Canadian prime minister welcomed the country’s new eleventh province.

“I love our new province of America,” he said. “I love the people of America. I know many people from America that are good friends of mine,” he said with a smirk, before explaining why the country shouldn’t exist anymore.

“America only works as a province,” he went on. “If you look at a map, they drew an artificial line right through it, between Canada and the province of America, just a straight artificial line. Somebody did it a long time ago — many, many, decades ago, and it makes no sense. It’s so perfect as a great and cherished province.”

The only sour note was the stubborn refusal by the Associated Press to call the Gulf of Canada by its new name. But the Canadian government didn’t ban A.P. from its press conferences, because Canadians are nice.

Albert Einstein

Today is Albert Einstein’s birthday. The great man was born on March 14, 1879.

If you ignore all of the many great contributions that Einstein made during his lifetime, and focus only on 1905, you will still come away dazed and astonished. In just that one year he published foundational scientific papers that completely transformed four different areas of science.

That year he published a landmark paper on the photoelectric effect, on brownian motion, on special relativity, and on the equivalency between matter and energy — popularly known as E = mc2.

Our modern views on space, time and matter were fundamentally altered by those four papers. For example, quantum theory arose from his paper on the photoelectric effect.

I doubt that such a streak of scientific brilliance will ever be duplicated. To me, there is something profoundly satisfying in knowing that it happened even once.

2500

In addition to being the 5th anniversary of the official start of the COVID pandemic, yesterday was also the day that the New York Times published the 2500th edition of the daily Spelling Bee puzzle. As an avid fan of the Spelling Bee, I was delighted.

It was also a very special day in Spelling Bee land because yesterday, for the first time, the creators of that puzzle broke one of their most notable rules: Among the seven letters, yesterday’s puzzle included the letter “s”.

Of course the inclusion of the letter “s” changes the puzzle greatly. You suddenly get double the number of nouns and verbs, because for those words you can just add an “s” to the end.

Some people might object to this sudden change in their daily word puzzle. Personally, I thought it was fabulous.

Five years later

How astonishing that it has been precisely five years to the day since I left New York City because of the pandemic. I did not come back again for a very long time.

NYU went completely virtual on that day. For a while classrooms were a shared idea rather than a physical thing.

Those times are long gone, yet they made their permanent mark on us. For one thing, our concepts around meeting have changed — and we often forget how profoundly.

It used to be that meeting over video chat was something you did only when you had to. Now most of my meetings seem to be done that way — even when I am meeting with someone who is in the same building.

Before March 12, 2020, that would have been unimaginable.

28 presidents

Our new administration’s economic policies have resulted in a precipitous decline in stock prices. Someone pointed out to me that in just that single day, the decline in the value of X stock caused Elon Musk to lose about $7.06 Billion.

My first thought was “Wow, he could have gotten more than 28 presidents elected for that money!”

Malhuret’s speech

Claude Malhuret’s speech on March 6 to the Senate of France may go down in history as one of the defining moments in democracy’s defense against fascism. As a patriotic American, faced with the current attack from within against our own democracy, I feel an obligation to repeat it here in its entirety:

“Europe is at a critical juncture of its history. The American shield is slipping away, Ukraine risks being abandoned, and Russia is being strengthened. Washington has become the court of Nero: An incendiary emperor, submissive courtiers, and a buffoon on ketamine tasked with purging the civil service.

“This is a tragedy for the free world, but it’s first and foremost a tragedy for the United States. Trump’s message is that being his ally serves no purpose, because he will not defend you, he will impose more tariffs on you than on his enemies, and he will threaten to seize your territories, while supporting the dictators who invade you.

“The king of the deal is showing what the art of the deal is lying prostrate. He thinks he will intimidate China by capitulating to Russian President Vladimir Putin, but China’s President Xi Jinping, faced with such wreckage, is undoubtedly accelerating his plans to invade Taiwan.

“Never in history has a president of the United States surrendered to the enemy. Never has one supported an aggressor against an ally, issued so many illegal decrees, and sacked so many military leaders in one go. Never has one trampled on the American Constitution, while threatening to disregard judges who stand in his way, weaken countervailing powers, and take control of social media.

“This is not a drift to illiberalism; this is the beginning of the seizure of democracy. Let us remember that it only took one month, three weeks, and two days to bring down the Weimar Republic and its constitution.

“I have confidence in the solidity of American democracy, and the country is already protesting. But in one month, Trump has done more harm to America than in four years of his last presidency. We were at war with a dictator; now we are fighting against a dictator supported by a traitor.

“Eight days ago, at the very moment when Trump was patting French President Emmanuel Macron on the back at the White House, the United States voted at the UN with Russia and North Korea against the Europeans demanding the withdrawal of Russian troops.

“Two days later, in the Oval Office, the draft-dodger was giving moral and strategic lessons to the Ukrainian president and war hero Volodymyr Zelensky before dismissing him like a stable boy, ordering him to submit or resign.

“That night, he took another step into disgrace by halting the delivery of promised weapons. What should we do in the face of such betrayal? The answer is simple: Stand firm.

“And above all, make no mistake. The defeat of Ukraine would be the defeat of Europe. The Baltic states, Georgia, and Moldova are already on the list. Putin’s goal is to return to the Yalta Agreement, where half the continent was ceded to Stalin.

“The countries of the Global South are waiting for the outcome of the conflict to decide whether they should continue to respect Europe, or whether they are now free to trample it.

“What Putin wants is the end of the world order the United States and its allies established 80 years ago, in which the first principle was the prohibition of acquiring territory by force.

“This idea is at the very foundation of the UN, where today Americans vote in favor of the aggressor and against the aggressed, because the Trumpian vision coincides with Putin’s: a return to spheres of influence, where great powers dictate the fate of small nations.

“Greenland, Panama, and Canada are mine. Ukraine, the Baltics and Eastern Europe are yours. Taiwan and the South China Sea are his.

“At the Mar-a-Lago dinner parties of golf-playing oligarchs, this is called “diplomatic realism.”

“We are therefore alone. But the narrative that Putin cannot be resisted is false. Contrary to Kremlin propaganda, Russia is doing poorly. In three years, the so-called second army in the world has managed to grab only crumbs from a country with about a quarter its population.

“With interest rates at 21 percent, the collapse of foreign currency and gold reserves, and a demographic crisis, Russia is on the brink. The American lifeline to Putin is the biggest strategic mistake ever made during a war.

“The shock is violent, but it has one virtue. The Europeans are coming out of denial. They understood in a single day in Munich that the survival of Ukraine and the future of Europe are in their hands, and that they have three imperatives.

“Accelerate military aid to Ukraine to compensate for the American abandonment, so that Ukraine can hang on, and of course to secure its and Europe’s place at the negotiating table.

“This will be costly. It will require ending the taboo on using Russia’s frozen assets. It will require bypassing Moscow’s accomplices within Europe itself through a coalition that includes only willing countries, and the United Kingdom of course.

“Second, demand that any agreement include the return of kidnapped children and prisoners, as well as absolute security guarantees. After Budapest, Georgia, and Minsk, we know what Putin’s agreements are worth. These guarantees require sufficient military force to prevent a new invasion.

“Finally, and most urgently because it will take the longest, we must build that neglected European defense, which has relied on the American security umbrella since 1945 and which was shut down after the fall of the Berlin Wall. The task is Herculean, but history books will judge the leaders of today’s democratic Europe by its success or failure.

“Friedrich Merz has just declared that Europe needs its own military alliance. This is a recognition that France has been right for decades in advocating for strategic autonomy.

“Now, it must be built. This will require massive investment to replenish the European Defense Fund beyond the Maastricht debt criteria, harmonize weapons and munitions systems, accelerate EU membership for Ukraine, which now has the leading army in Europe, rethink the role and conditions of nuclear deterrence based on French and British capabilities, and relaunch missile shield and satellite programs.

“Europe can become a military power again only by becoming an industrial power again. But the real rearmament of Europe is its moral rearmament.

“We must convince public opinion in the face of war weariness and fear, and above all in the face of Putin’s collaborators on the far right and far left.

“They say they want peace. What neither they nor Trump say is that their peace is capitulation, the peace of defeat, the replacement of a de Gaullian Zelensky by a Ukrainian Pétain under Putin’s thumb.The peace of collaborators who for three years, have refused to support the Ukrainians in any way.

“Is this the end of the Atlantic alliance? The risk is great. But in recent days, Zelensky’s public humiliation, and all the crazy decisions taken over the last month, have finally stirred Americans into action. Poll numbers are plummeting. Republican elected officials are greeted by hostile crowds in their constituencies. Even Fox News is becoming critical.

“The Trumpists are no longer at the height of glory. They control the executive branch, Congress, the Supreme Court and social media. But in American history, the supporters of freedom have always won. They are starting to raise their heads.

“The fate of Ukraine will be decided in the trenches, but it also depends on those who defend democracy in the United States, and here, on our ability to unite Europeans and find the means for our common defense, to make Europe the power it once was and hesitates to become again.

“Our parents defeated fascism and communism at the cost of great sacrifice. The task of our generation is to defeat the totalitarianisms of the 21st century. Long live free Ukraine, long live democratic Europe.”

The news

Not all technology is good. Maybe we were better off back when it was easier to avoid the incessant barrage of the news cycle.

This seems particularly true now, when a kleptocracy is working very hard to destroy the United States of America from within, and take much of the rest of the world down with it.